Skip to content
GoldToday Magazine

Venezuela Could Now Shape Trump's Political Legacy - as well as the United States' Role in the Global Order

Following executing a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be getting into the nation-building arena.

In a striking media briefing at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief declared that US forces had successfully apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a delegation including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be assuming control of the embattled nation.

"We are going to run the country until such time as we can do a secure, proper and judicious transition," he said.

What exactly "governing the state" involves is uncertain, but the pledge represents an abrupt change of course for the president, full of contradictions and formidable challenges.

A president who campaigned against "forever wars", who sharply criticised past US efforts at regime change and who promised to implement an "America First" international policy is now gambling his administration on effectively revitalizing a South American nation whose economic system is collapsed and whose governmental stability has been eroded by decades of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was relentlessly confident.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this would be no different. He pledged to enlist American oil firms to rebuild Venezuela's crumbling industrial infrastructure, providing financing for the American rebuilding project and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He left open the possibility of deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to further these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to heed the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you shatter it, you are responsible for it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has reshaped Venezuela's destiny – for better or worse.

Trump entered office nearly a year ago pledging to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has proven that he is more than willing to use military force around the globe.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted atomic sites in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, militias in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Unlike previous operations, which have mostly involved rockets and aircraft that minimize the exposure of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his pledges to the future of that nation – are strikingly different.

His goal, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Response at Home and Abroad

That twist on Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - mantra might prove difficult for some of Trump's backers to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump loyalist who split from the president after charging him of abandoning his political base, was swift to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's perpetual use of force and support of overseas conflicts is understandable because we are compelled to pay for it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another notable Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on arms and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim confiscated US oil and stop fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers supported the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the military action against a "criminal regime" as "decisive and justified".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his press conference, the president argued the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" agenda because it ensured US hemispheric security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American diplomatic policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Trump Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will never be challenged again."

The goal of the new US security policy, he said, was to "protect commerce, land and assets that are central to our security interests." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "home region."

Trump's choice to capture Maduro will provoke broader questions in international relations, however, and affect American ties with the world's other significant global powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement expressing shock and condemning what it said was a irresponsible assault on a sovereign nation.

During the Biden administration, the US offered comparable censures of Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to mediate a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often seemed to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, expressed worry about the signal Trump's actions might send.

"My primary worry is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an invasion of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic opponents were sharper.

"The United States should not be running other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in perpetual conflicts and overthrow attempts that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a criminal and a autocrat with a record of human rights abuses. But he censured Trump's choice not to inform legislative leaders before launching the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to follow the law and protect institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First demands."

Trump, in his remarks, said that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" particulars of the operation prior to the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a triumph – with no American casualties and minimal harm to US assets. Trump, with his characteristic bravado, described the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "one of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and proficiency in American history."

Now he is betting his presidency on that success enduring, as the US claims it will assume responsibility for administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that truly entails remains unknown. He and his team must rebuild a nation that has been in turmoil for years while stabilising a hemisphere that is bound to be cautious of what Trump's international strategy has planned for them.

By

Debbie Santiago

A financial analyst specializing in commodity markets with over a decade of experience in precious metals trading and economic forecasting.

GoldToday Magazine

Type to search articles.